Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:16:38 -0500
with message-id
<caaajcmzbw0zzr_hrk6eoigfugnj8vh7yl-acmqh07cxtaeu...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: libblockdev FTBFS on s390x: new symbols
has caused the Debian Bug report #890885,
regarding libblockdev FTBFS on s390x: new symbols
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
890885: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890885
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libblockdev
Version: 2.16-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libblockdev&arch=s390x&ver=2.16-1&stamp=1519088073&raw=0
...
dh_makeshlibs -- -c4
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see
diff output below
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libblockdev2/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match
completely debian/libblockdev2.symbols
--- debian/libblockdev2.symbols (libblockdev2_2.16-1_s390x)
+++ dpkg-gensymbolsXBhD5b 2018-02-20 00:54:29.197391206 +0000
@@ -233,6 +233,18 @@
_bd_part_set_part_id@Base 2.14
_bd_part_set_part_name@Base 2.14
_bd_part_set_part_type@Base 2.14
+ _bd_s390_dasd_format@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_dasd_is_fba@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_dasd_is_ldl@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_dasd_needs_format@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_dasd_online@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_is_tech_avail@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_sanitize_dev_input@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_zfcp_offline@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_zfcp_online@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_zfcp_sanitize_lun_input@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_zfcp_sanitize_wwpn_input@Base 2.16-1
+ _bd_s390_zfcp_scsi_offline@Base 2.16-1
_bd_swap_is_tech_avail@Base 2.14
_bd_swap_mkswap@Base 2.14
_bd_swap_set_label@Base 2.14
@@ -784,6 +796,31 @@
bd_plugin_spec_free@Base 2.14
bd_plugin_spec_get_type@Base 2.14
bd_reinit@Base 2.14
+ bd_s390_dasd_format@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_format_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_is_fba@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_is_fba_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_is_ldl@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_is_ldl_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_needs_format@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_needs_format_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_online@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_dasd_online_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_error_quark@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_is_tech_avail@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_is_tech_avail_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_sanitize_dev_input@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_sanitize_dev_input_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_offline@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_offline_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_online@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_online_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_sanitize_lun_input@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_sanitize_lun_input_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_sanitize_wwpn_input@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_sanitize_wwpn_input_stub@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_scsi_offline@Base 2.16-1
+ bd_s390_zfcp_scsi_offline_stub@Base 2.16-1
bd_swap_error_quark@Base 2.14
bd_swap_is_tech_avail@Base 2.14
bd_swap_is_tech_avail_stub@Base 2.14
@@ -820,6 +857,8 @@
get_mpath_num_functions@Base 2.14
get_part_functions@Base 2.14
get_part_num_functions@Base 2.14
+ get_s390_functions@Base 2.16-1
+ get_s390_num_functions@Base 2.16-1
get_swap_functions@Base 2.14
get_swap_num_functions@Base 2.14
load_btrfs_from_plugin@Base 2.14
@@ -832,6 +871,7 @@
load_mdraid_from_plugin@Base 2.14
load_mpath_from_plugin@Base 2.14
load_part_from_plugin@Base 2.14
+ load_s390_from_plugin@Base 2.16-1
load_swap_from_plugin@Base 2.14
unload_btrfs@Base 2.14
unload_crypto@Base 2.14
@@ -843,4 +883,5 @@
unload_mdraid@Base 2.14
unload_mpath@Base 2.14
unload_part@Base 2.14
+ unload_s390@Base 2.16-1
unload_swap@Base 2.14
dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:21: override_dh_makeshlibs] Error 2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Ha, I fixed this bug at the same time you were reporting it.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libblockdev
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-utopia-maintainers
