On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Jens Reyer wrote: > Without wine32 there is no /usr/bin/wine now. I put the multiarch > instructions to the README. Do we live with that, or should we change > anything?
I consider this a regression. The loss of the wrapper script drops the ability to detect and tell the user how to enable multi-arch. > I started with a new package wineserverVERSION (commits 1-5). The git > history at that point gives a fully working new setup. > > However I decided to put the wineserver in the wineVERSION package and > make that arch specific (commit 6). The wine package should stay comprised of only scripts and manpages and remain arch:all. > Commits 7-9 are documentation and cleanup. The change to default WINEDEBUG level and its documentation isn't desired. > Unrelated to all those changes is the merge of the wine32|64-tools > packages (commit 10). This should be possible now since they aren't > multi-arch'd anymore (wine32-tools was still offered to me by aptitude, > which I didn't expect after the recent changes. This gave me the idea to > just merge them.) The tools really should be multiarch. The change I made was a quick fix for a bug, which needs a more permanent solution. Please revert this. Best wishes, Mike _______________________________________________ pkg-wine-party mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party
