On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > task-xfce-desktop is for installation time, so here Depends is correct. We > want light-locker by default, but people are free to remove it afterwards if > they know what they do. > Uh, no, because when you go to delete light-locker, aptitude stops you because deleting that hard dependency will break task-xfce-desktop.
It sounds like what task-xfce-desktop actually wants to do is depend on a meta-package ('x-display-locker'?), of which both light-locker and xscreensaver are members. Then the user could swap out display lockers without breaking task-xfce-desktop's requirement that there be *a* display locker of some sort. Schwab _______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list Pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel