On mer., 2016-06-22 at 22:31 +0200, Lee Garrett wrote: > On 22/06/16 22:04, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > Well, actually that's wrong. It *can* run rootless, but lightdm doesn't > > support it, and light-locker obviously requires lightdm. > > Ah, sorry, I (naively) assumed that all display managers run rootless by now.
As far as I can tell, only gdm3 does it. > > On my system I have gdm3 and lightdm installed, and but gdm3 is my default > display manager. Maybe that is the issue here? > > randall@saito:~$ cat /etc/X11/default-display-manager > /usr/sbin/gdm3 Indeed. > > The package descriptions says it relies on lightdm, and there's a hard > dependency on lightdm, but maybe that's not enough. Unfortunately, enforcing a *runtime* dependency on lightdm is not really possible here, even thought it'd be nice. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list Pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
