Code looks good.
In this sort of situation with the hsm, the testing to work is the most 
important
due to how picky they can be.

Thus, (tested to work) ACK.



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christina Fu" <c...@redhat.com>
> To: pki-devel@redhat.com
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 9:39:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pki-devel] 
> 0119-Ticket-2303-Key-recovery-fails-with-KRA-on-lunaSA.patch
> 
> As planned, the patches have been tested successfully in the following
> environments for both key archival and recovery:
> 1. for functionality test: rhel7.2 vm with Gemalto lunasa (CKE) - both TMS
> and non-TMS
> 2. for regression test: rhel7.2 vm with Thales nethsm - both TMS and non-TMS
> 
> thanks,
> Christina
> 
> On 05/06/2016 11:10 AM, Christina Fu wrote:
> 
> 
> One patch for JSS
> one patch for KRA
> These patches should address the KRA unwrap issues when the keys are on
> lunaSA.
> 
> the KRA patch will required the JSS patch to function.
> It is also required for the lunaSA to be of the following model: CKE – Key
> Export Models
> 
> Christina
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-devel mailing list Pki-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-devel mailing list
> Pki-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel

_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
Pki-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel

Reply via email to