Cool, thanks for the update. Just one thing: > * nupas now forks various io() procs and handle multiple 9p conversations. > Two locks have been created to protect the reads and the writes to the 9p > pipe, so only one io proc could read or write at a time. The main proc waits > until the exit of its childs, this is a change of the original behaviour on > which RFNOTEG was used in the rfork call.
Any reason to not use rwlocks to enforce this? > - tests it with more complex setup (feedback welcome, so if you have a couple > of mailboxes and have the time to try it, will be appreciated) My gmail has thousands of messages; also I can try to get an OK to do testing from my company (since I work in the email space and my employment agreement prohibits it in general). --dho --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Plan 9 Google Summer of Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/plan9-gsoc?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
