Hi All Readers, I am not involved with Plan 9 GSoC in any other way than just being a watcher. However, I wish to make a suggestion here. Priyanka's is a Glendix project, even though it is under Plan 9. Should the status updates be CC'ed to the Glendix mailing list also? --> [email protected]
I would like if these updates are archived in that list also. There is no one there yet, who is not here, but this suggestion is purely for archival sake. Regards, On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Priyanka Sharma<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > Here I am writing about my work I did in last week and what I am doing in > week 4. > > Week 3: > > 1) Understand system calls in glendix > 2) Understand rfork() > 2) find the the system call number required for rfork() > 3) add it to glendix > 4) add implementation of rfork() in which using RFCNAMEG flag and calling > unshare() system call in linux kernel, > new namespace can be created > 5) compile it > > Currently, I working on verification the rfork() system call in glendix. > Does it work properly for namespaces, as its expected ? > > Week4 : > > Implementation mount and umount which will be different from global mount. > They will use their own namespace and behave similar like in plan9. > > -- > Thanks & Regards > Priyanka > > > > > -- Rahul Murmuria --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Plan 9 Google Summer of Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/plan9-gsoc?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
