I just was pointing out that (at least last time we participated) students were required to upload their projects to a google-code repo before the end of GSoC, so I thought it might make sense to use that.
Nothing against bitbucket per see, but the less copies of stuff are floating around and the less work that needs to be done, the better. Btw, the issue with uploading p9p to google-code would go away if p9p included some set of free fonts (and perhaps people could download the non-free ones if they feel like it), the non-free fonts have made distribution and re-distribution of Inferno a huge pain, and preclude the packaging of p9p and Inferno for many linux distributions /end-offtopic-rant Peace uriel On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Russ Cox<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Uriel<[email protected]> wrote: >> If you are going to use an external hg providers, I would use >> google-code, because you are going to be required to upload there >> anyway. > > I don't see what's wrong with using bitbucket instead of google code. > In fact, coincidentally I have been playing with bitbucket this morning > as a potential place to keep plan9port. I cannot keep it on google code > because it does not use one of the approved licenses. > > Russ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Plan 9 Google Summer of Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/plan9-gsoc?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
