with these as a baseline, the time commitment probably drops a bit lower on all
the
difference scenarios. The only thing Ron wouldn't have had would be the 9P
transport.
The student would still be able to accommodate qemu/kvm pci-probe methodology
for
getting access to the devices, and that's probably a non-trivial bit of work.
-eric
On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:22 AM, ron minnich wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Saeid Al-Wazzan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> I guess I misunderstood, what you meant was a front-end driver that can
>> speak 9P. I think
>> that should be a priority. What I'm concerned about is whether the summer is
>> a realistic time frame
>> for completing this effort. I have not done this before so I have no real
>> way of gauging it.
>
>
> For the lguest port I had to write some virtio drivers for Plan 9.
> Maybe these could be used as a starting point. Unless they are lacking
> in some way.
>
> ron
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Plan 9 Google Summer of Code" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/plan9-gsoc?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Plan
9 Google Summer of Code" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/plan9-gsoc?hl=en.
