Jesse Alama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use `C-c C-c', which is normally bound to
> `planner-copy-or-move-task', to move tasks from one day to another.
> To my surprise, though, I found out that when I moved from one part of
> a task line to another, `C-c C-c' was assigned to a different command.
>
> The task line I have in mind is this:
>
> #B _ Check out Pascal Bourguignon's advice for resuming ERC after sleep :
> [[gnus://nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.erc.general/<[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>][Post from Pascal Bourguignon on
> nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.erc.general]] {{Tasks:161}} ([[task-pool]])
>
> If I'm at the beginning of this line, `C-c C-c' means
> `planner-copy-or-move-task'. If I hit TAB, the point is moved to the
> beginning of the gnus link, and then `C-c C-c' means
> `muse-follow-name-at-point'. I found this annoying because I expected
> `C-c C-c' not to change its meaning from `planner-copy-or-move-task'
> as the point is moved from one part of a single task line to another.
>
> Bug? Feature?
>
I discovered this recently too. I don't much like it. I don't understand the
usefulness of the C-c C-c muse-follow-name-at-point binding given that RET does
the same thing with less trouble. And it is useful for the planner function to
be able to work no matter where in the task you are.
mwolson, what do you think about removing this binding from muse?
--
-John Sullivan
-http://www.wjsullivan.net
-GPG Key: AE8600B6
_______________________________________________
Planner-el-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
