John Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hadron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > >> For this reason the include code is better IMO. If you can edit it, it >> seems appropriate that it is saved back. > > I'll clarify the documentation on this. It's something to get used to > -- there
Great : when you know about it, its ok, but as a beginner it is confusing. > are other planner libraries as well that incorporate information into your > planner pages, but are not intended to provide editing capabilities. You can > display commit log note information, for example, but editing the log notes on > your planner page does not edit the log notes themselves. It seems inherently wrong to me : the presence of the "insinuate" functions would hint that dependant/source files are updated in the same way updating a taskpool updates a day page. -- _______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
