Hadron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hadron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> [...] >> >>> I would expect it to show the "Planner View" for that day which includes the >>> Diary section, but not to create the physical file. The creation of the >>> physical muse file on the hard drive should only happen with task >>> creation. >>> >> >> So you're suggesting that a buffer should be created containing a planner >> page >> but that is disconnected from any file? That sounds both very un-emacs and >> mildly dangerous. What happens if you edit something in that buffer? >> Should it > > It is tagged to be saved. >
But how is that different from what happens now? The planner file that is created by the preview isn't saved until you tell it to be saved (I don't think). >> be read-only? So then if you decide you want to work with that file, you have >> to take an additional step to create it, even though you are already looking >> at >> it? That sounds very inconvenient. I don't really see the problem with an >> overcrowded Plans directory -- there are navigation commands in Planner, so >> you >> don't ever have to look at the full list of Plan pages. And files in the >> future >> are going to be created eventually anyway. Time does march on :). > > planner-index? > I sympathize with the idea that just passing over a date in the calendar shouldn't generate a planner page, but I don't think that your solution is a good one. I'm not willing to go the route of creating "pseudo" planner pages. -- John Sullivan Emacs Planner Maintainer http://www.wjsullivan.net/PlannerMode.html GPG Key: AE8600B6 _______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
