Hi Leo, hi planner folks! Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder, would be appropriate to phase out planner? As you Leo I was deep into Planner before diving into Org. But I think different people have different needs, and it's always great to have a lots of different Emacs packages in the wild. Maybe a comparison would be useful for people trying to find their way through this wildness. Here is a first attempt. | Feature | planner-mode | org-mode | |--------------------------+---------------+-----------------------------| | XEmacs/Emacs compat. | ... | okay | | file management | daily-based | project-based | | export formats | See muse | HTML LaTeX | | add-ons | ... | TOC blorg registry | | mailers support | ... | gnus vm wl mh rmail | | link types | ... | http file bbdb w3 w3m info | | calendar/diary/appt | native | native | | use it as a wiki | native | thru file links? | | allow multiple projects | yes | yes | | allow project overview | ... | quick | | GTD implementation | ... | yes | | infile time manipulation | ... | yes | | time reports | yes | yes | | outline structure | no | yes | | table editing | orgtbl-mode | native | | maintainer | Michael Olson | Carsten Dominik | | community | active | very active | Please improve it and consider this as a very drafty version of what can be done. I would *love* to hear about features that planner has and Org has not, or maybe perspectives from which planner has a good point -- since it will help Org progress on this :) Regards, -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Planner-el-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/planner-el-discuss
