Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday 03 October 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote: >> On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:08:41 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >>> systray-refactor - needs the plasmoid protocol finished out, but >>> generally there. (notifications?) >>> kuiserver - should be added to the systemtray? >> Or maybe just keep as a seperate plasmoid which can of course be used >> through the systray's plasmoid protocal.
This would mean that kuiserver's extender would be different to systray's thus negating the purpose of integrating the two. >> Because as opposed to the >> notifications applet, the kuiserver applet really needs an icon to >> open/close the popup. Transfers often take a while, and you don't want to >> have the popup open all the time while a transfer of multiple hours is >> running, while you do want to open it sometimes to take a look at how for >> the transfer is. I hadn't considered this. > the KUIServer protocol in systray-refactor could create the icon, which the > systray would then add This is definitely a possibility, but I'm not sure it's really possible to accomplish by October 19th. Assuming that the icon would show/hide the extender, there are issues such as the interaction between the kuiserver hide/show and knotify notifications, or how an icon adding through the Task protocol can even get access to the extender. Given that the systray is a fairly core piece of the workspace, I'd really prefer to spend the alpha/beta stage ironing out any regressions from 4.1 rather than forcing in changes that weren't designed for... -- Jason Stubbs _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel