On Friday 16 January 2009 19:15:55 you wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2009, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Please have a look at the attached patch and give comments on it ;-) > > before this goes in (and the patch looks ok at first read) i think we may > want to step back and ask ourselves: > > "Do we really want a task bar that behaves exactly like the current task > bar, except that it has no text?" > > - or - > > "Do we want a task bar that actually has the semantics of a dock?" > > if the latter, we ought to create a sperate widget. this new widget and the > tasks widget can certainly share a lot of code and classes, but i don't > think that shoving more and more options in and complicating the code more > and more makes the most sense if what we really want is a dock when it's > all said and done. Personally I would like to have a dock and of course I thought of a dock when starting to work on this part ;-) But first of all for me only icons would be enough for saving space ;-) I don't know how much work it would be to get a dock starting from the tasks widget. Most of the functionality of the tasks widget will be needed in a dock, too. Of course the quicklaunch functionality has to be added and saving the positions, etc. > > btw, in the code, instead of doing the checkedState comparison, you can > just do isChecked(). so much shorter =) checkedState only really matters > for tristate controls. I just wanted to keep the code consistent to the existing checks ;-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel