On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Benoit Jacob wrote: > 2009/4/8 Andrew Stromme <astro...@chatonka.com>: > > It would be nice to have more descriptive names than "Color 1", "Color 2" > > etc.. for the color selection. Maybe something like "Inside Color", > > "Outline Color", "Fringe Color" or "Main Color", "Secondary Color", > > etc... would be more self-explanatory? > > Good idea. I have just a question which I'm afraid will reveal how > much of an ignorant I am when it comes to GUI. I am afraid that these > i18n'ed strings might become too long in certain languages to fit in > the given horizontal space in the dialog.
the colour strings above are fine. they will "grow" in some languages, but this dialog isn't running out of horizontal space just yet ;) > > I assume "Fineness" means "Level of Detail" or "Graphics Quality"? Would > > one of those be more descriptive to the user? > > OK. It means technically the "number of iterations". So i guess that > "level of detail" is ok. Level of detail is a good one, yes. > > Lastly, and in the same vein, "Lock" could be something like "Allow > > Panning/Zooming with mouse" (of course then it would probably be checked > > by default) or "Lock Current View". > > I like "lock current view". Agreed; or even just "Lock view". you can put a tooltip on it noting that it means not interactivity such as panning and zooming with the mouse. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel