Aaron J. Seigo 写道:
On September 1, 2009, 潘卫平(Peter Pan) wrote:
yes, no need.
the point of that code was to prevent people from emptying the trash while the
trash was already emptying. as this can take quite a while, this is a nice
feature. it let the user know that their action was successful and prevents
people from selecting it over and over. we had this exact problem in 4.0.
Although emptyTrash->setEnabled(m_count > 0) works well in updateIcon()
function, I'd like to do emptyTrash->setEnabled(false) after emptying trash.
How about the patch followed?
the KNotification bit looks correct, however.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
--
潘卫平(Peter Pan)
Red Flag Software Co., Ltd
Index: trash.cpp
===================================================================
--- trash.cpp (revision 1018644)
+++ trash.cpp (working copy)
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <KUrl>
#include <KProcess>
#include <KStandardDirs>
+#include <KNotification>
#include <kfileplacesmodel.h>
@@ -226,10 +227,13 @@
{
Q_UNUSED(exitCode)
Q_UNUSED(exitStatus)
+
+ KNotification::event("Trash: emptied", QString() , QPixmap() , 0l, KNotification::DefaultEvent );
+
//TODO: check the exit status and let the user know if it fails
delete m_emptyProcess;
m_emptyProcess = 0;
- emptyTrash->setEnabled(true);
+ emptyTrash->setEnabled(false);
emptyTrash->setText(i18n("&Empty Trashcan"));
}
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
