We already talked about this on IRC, so just recording for everyone else. On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org> wrote: > On September 14, 2009, Ian Monroe wrote: >> Do you want bindings of the chunks of the Qt api + Plamsa API? Or just >> a simplified subset of the Plasma API? > > both, as separate entities; and we already have the latter in fairly decent > shape at this point. > >> If its the former, we should talk. :) I've started the very beginnings >> of a Smoke-based binding. > > smoke based? have you looked into the qscript generator that Kent @ Qt has > been working on (for a long time now ... i wonder why there isn't more news > about it by now...)
This is what Amarok already uses. We have a long torrid history together (I ported it to cmake, and then later pissed off all the distros by requiring it as a separate dependency). The problem is that uses massive amounts of memory. > in any case, yes, we are -quite- interested in full qt+kdelibs QScript > bindings Cool. I'll be emailing later today or tomorrow and we can get started in Gitorious. I'm also going to email Kent to make sure I'm not pulling a Brisbane. Ian _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel