ervin accepted this revision. ervin added a comment.
In D24848#551863 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D24848#551863>, @broulik wrote: > Interesting, I thought Qt would/could static_assert that Well, it turns out the signatures were compatible in fact (getters connected to a function which takes no parameter, signatures are fine). But since it is done by the C++ compiler, this one has no idea if the second parameter of the connect is indeed a signal (this is a completely alien concept to it). This is the one blind spot of the new style connects. REPOSITORY R119 Plasma Desktop REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D24848 To: bport, #plasma, mart, ervin, broulik Cc: broulik, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, ngraham, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart