On March 30, 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Tuesday 30 March 2010 16:56:44 daithe...@free.fr wrote: > > ----- "todd rme" <toddrme2...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > I don't think focusing this on HD devices is necessarily a good move. > > > There are still a huge number of standard-definition TV's out there > > > and there probably will be for some time. > > > > I agree, + new mobile devices like iPad and iPad-like :) > > My point is that those devices are different enough to use their own shell > (i.e. not necessarily PMC). It's similar to the difference between > plasma-netbook and plasma- mobile.
when it comes to 10 foot UI devices (e.g. TVs), you are exactly right imho. there is one additional point that i think may be confusing some of the people in this thread, however: PMC is special in that in the laptop/tablet/netbook case there will already be a Plasma shell running (e.g. plasma-desktop or plasma-netbook) and PMC may be started in addition to that primary shell essentially as a full screen application. this is a special case where there will be two full plasma shells running. to the user it will look like "one thing", but us developers will know better ;) but in a PVR type experience, PMC would be the only shell. in this sense, PMC is unique compared to the other plasma shells in that it may be run as The Shell and sometimes as an Add-On To The Main Shell. on mobile, it's just completely irrelevant (something different yet again is needed there; play with canola on a small device, then on a large screen if you are in doubt :) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
