Same conclusion from my side. First the basic fucntionality and UI polish, then feature additions.
I also agree with Alessandro that extragear sounds like a good home, but as was side before: in due time. I finished the slideshow part yesterday and hope I can submit to reviewboard this afternoon. Cheers, Christophe Olinger On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org> wrote: > On April 22, 2010, Christopher Blauvelt wrote: > > > Recording the incoming signal is not the difficult part. The difficult > > > part is the management. Scheduling recordings, storing recordings, > > > deconflicting recordings given a variable number of tv tuners, receiving > > > and processing accuarate show scheduling information. These are > > > non-trivial items which took the MythTV folks a while to get right. If > > > we're going to go down this route, I think it would make more sense to > > > connect to the MythTV backend (whether remote or on the local machine) > and > > > manage recordings that way, but all in due time. > > agreed, on both conclusions :) > > -- > > Aaron J. Seigo > > humru othro a kohnu se > > GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 > > KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks > > > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel