alnikiforov added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> davidedmundson wrote in itemcontainer.cpp:68 > Right, this one line makes a lot of sense. > > I can imagine QQuickItem::~QuickItem changes parent, and calling > ItemContainer::setLayout after we've run our ItemContainers destructor means > all bets are completely off. I can believe an already destroyed QPointer > behaves weirdly. > > Lets not change the other two. There's no chance of an event loop processing > a timer event after ItemContainer:::~ItemContainer before we're auto > disconnected. Should I remove these 2 disconnects or leave them as they are? REPOSITORY R120 Plasma Workspace REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D27650 To: alnikiforov, ngraham, davidedmundson, mart Cc: anthonyfieroni, plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, ngraham, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart
