ngraham added a comment.
In D28971#652708 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D28971#652708>, @mart wrote: > my concern here using qsettings in this place, is that then it kinda clashes when an application uses its own config like it should, from a framework (kconfiggroup, kconfigskeleton etc) > i always refrained from using any form of config read/write here, and i think we should continue to do so. > Kirigami is a tier1 framework that should do the kleast possible, is more like KGuiAddons/§KWidgetAddons, *not* a full feature kxmlgui, which if we want to have something along the lines, we should have a proper framework to do so, and not tier1 If that's your vision for Kirigami, then we definitely need one, yeah. Otherwise our QML apps are going to need to endlessly reinvent this kind of wheel. REPOSITORY R1014 Kirigami Gallery REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D28971 To: cblack, #kirigami Cc: mart, ngraham, ndavis, plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, domson, dkardarakos, ZrenBot, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, davidedmundson
