- Generally working well - There seems to be an uptick in new contributors \o/
-------- - We had a discussion about how to make review queues a big more manageable. We intend to use some labels. Action plan is to copy + paste the labels Krita uses...as if it works for them, they're probably good enough. Bshah is to do this. Labels are technically per-project, but as long as they have the same name it's fine. -------- - There was a discussion on the two different styles of use gitlab use. Some people squash locally and have a nice neat commit history. Others don't, and then just squash at end. - Conclusion was it's unreasonable to get devs to squash and rebase "nicely" as it's perceived as too hard (even though it really isn't - ed) - As reviewers we're just cope with the fact that these two workflows exist - We do need to be careful when people squash as the commit message used is not the merge messages - Maybe we should make squash a default option - in current gitlab this option doesn't exist David