On Monday 12 July 2010 12:16:04 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > me realy does not care much as long as we have something that looks > > pretty and is easy to recognize by the user, i proposed to do those > > icons because wen I saw how our Chani chose random icons to represent > > them, i had my typical "your icons look soo ugly used like that" > > feeling... so I proposed > > > > > > , what if i do a batch of consistent icons that a user can choose form > > that don't look terribly wrong together? > > Well, you already promised to do that :)
I was explaining how it went :D > > thumbnails can work just as well its a > > Thumbnails are not a real option because of technical difficulties and > (un)usefulness. > 1. See prev mail > 2. Even if we add windows into thumbs (and not only plasma's look) - > compare a thumbnail of kmail to a thumb of akregator (and a lot of > other programs). There is no significant difference (thumbs need to be > rather small). And, the thumbs would be constantly changing which is > *bad*. > 3. What when there are more screens? yeah -- oxygen guy, "I make the pretty pictures" _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel