On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 7:02 PM David Redondo <k...@david-redondo.de> wrote: > > Am Montag, 14. Juni 2021, 15:43:52 CEST schrieb Nate Graham: > > KGlobaAccel seems somewhat fragile; I feel like every time anyone > > touches anything about it, stuff breaks. Is it possible to improve unit > > test coverage for it? > > I don't think more testing of KGlobalAccel would solve the problem. > The problem is that not all of the behavior is clear from the API, > and contains some gotchas, see the linked MRs. So KGlobalAccel itself as the > shortcut daemon works, but the client side API has room for improvement.
We can have KGlobalAccel test against the daemon, no? Aleix
