On Monday, July 12, 2010 04:09:44 am Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 12 July 2010, Alessandro Diaferia wrote: > > Il 12/07/2010 12:54, Marco Martin ha scritto: > > > On Monday 12 July 2010, Markus Slopianka wrote: > > >> On Monday 12 July 2010 11:47:51 Marco Martin wrote: > > >>> or do you have a better idea to -magically- find an image that > > >>> represent that activity without user intervention? > > >> > > >> Why would Activities be created without user intervention? > > > > > > not creation of activities without user intervention, but assigning a > > > meaningful image without the user being forced to chose something > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Marco Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Plasma-devel mailing list > > > Plasma-devel@kde.org > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > > > > Well, I don't completely see the point of avoiding any type of > > configuration to the user. IMO, when creating a new activity, the user > > might be prompted to choose among a set of default activities. Those > > activities might already have a name and a default icon together with > > some default plasmoids already loaded. Then the user might eventually > > choose to create his custom activity and in that case he would choose a > > name and an icon in place of a default, generic one. > > that could be an idea. > the corresponding containment (or the first if there are more that one > containment per activity) could be loaded from a javascript template with > default plasmoids that have something to do with it >
+1, javascript template support is already halfway there, and the user can already choose containment types (desktop, folderview, etc). _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
