I'd say it's fine, there needs to be a last one. Also, we make the rules and we can break them. If a new release needs making we have all the means and agency to do so.
Aleix On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 10:30 PM Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> wrote: > > Tricky situation. > > It feels a bit stinky if we strictly define "supported" to mean "will > receive further bug-fix releases", since then the final bug-fix release > is always unsupported the moment it's released. > > But on the other hand, how are we going to support it if no more bug-fix > releases are planned? > > Perhaps we need a more flexible definition of "supported". > > > Nate
