On Thursday 20 January 2011, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > qt has a (quite scarce) conventions document > > Yes, it covers a bit specific stuff where the more important things > are not present. > > The thing currently on my mind is the following - if the Qt examples > and the mentioned page are to be followed - we'd end up with something > like this: > > property string title > > Text { > id: title > } > > Which sucks :)
agree > (for the time being, I started naming things like I used to name > widgets in normal UIs - id:textTitle - for Text type, imageIcon for > Image type etc.) I always do the opposite, like iconImage and titleText, otherwise remembers me too much of the hungarian form that i never liked (just gut feeling) ;) Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel