> > > https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1A7bdmsLBE_oeRZPHxZNMBVAxMQZCkQIclWOrd2mRLGs/edit?hl=en_US > > Close. A few things: > > I would move the list of activities to the top right, using a drop-down > list. >
I tried, but such layout look unbalanced. Those 2 lines of preferences gives just the right weight for the UI. > > For the controls (rotate, re size, arrow), are they displayed on mouse > over > > or always? > > Always. Because of how other interfaces work on past experience, > users are unlikely to try to interact with the screens unless they > have some clear indicitation that they should > The difference with previous experiences - current mock has close to no options that user could try to change. In combination with the size (like 60-70% of window) is preview widget, I personally believe there is no way user wont try to hover the monitors. Otherwise there is nothing else to do. In unknown situations people just starts experimenting > > > Also how would this layout perform using clone mode? One display would be > > below and unelectable. Unless then overlapping, some popup could came up > and > > let user to select display in the background. > > If they are different sizes, the smaller one would be on top always. > Otherwise it would probably show as a "clone display" rather than > showing the individual displays. > Alternate layout for cloned mode added in the mock.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel