On 20 September 2011 19:06, Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org> wrote: > > I think the 3 days refer to his outstanding review requests, not the > language > plugin. >
correct.:) On 20 September 2011 12:29, Milian Wolff <m...@milianw.de> wrote: > > Sure. But "has" is too strong a word ;-) "should" is much better here I > think > :P :) > Again: Plasmate would first have to be ported to reuse kdevplatform code at > least for the editor. > i would like to hear your opinions about that.. When plasmate was writen i wasn't around. I am not aware if the plasma teams wants plasmate to use code from kdevplatform or not Since you seem to be in a hurry, if you think three days make a difference > or > not, of course and its not going to take a week or 2.I know that it will take much longer > let me state this one clearly again: Language plugins are demanding work. > I would also like to clarify that,i am not so experienced nor good so if the architecture of the code will be made by me the code will probably be mess. > Not only on the time part - the PHP language plugin e.g. took roughly two > man > years of work. Some more thoughts about the requirements of the plugin,the kdevelop team doesn't have the man power to start/support such an afford. Correct? If this is valid,is it wisely to start this project,since there is the danger of having it without maintenance after it gets completed. -- Tsiapaliwkas Giorgos (terietor) KDE Developer terietor.gr
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel