On Dec 2, 2011 8:45 PM, "Diego Casella ([Po]lentino)" < polentino...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> ---------- Messaggio inoltrato ---------- >> From: Martin Gräßlin <mgraess...@kde.org> >> To: plasma-devel@kde.org >> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:29:12 +0100 >> Subject: Re: Re: refreshing the system tray icons >> >> On Thursday 01 December 2011 21:11:30 Marco Martin wrote: >> > (even tough i'm still not sure if is a good idea to give icon for the >> > applications like say, amarok) >> no it's not, but reality is that it looks very inconsistant and it does not >> look like we would get the applications out of the systray in 4.8. >> >> So from me +1 to monochrome > > +1 for me too. > The point is we should make the tray more consistent and less cluttered ihmo, esp. because it kinda disorient "regular users" about the "things" the tray stores. Be them plasmoids, application's tray icons, or daemons reminder, the user doesn't care about how they are implemented, but which actions they provide. Soooo yep, having all monochrome icons is a great improvement about consistency :)
+1 for the classic monochrome tray icons. > > An other thing that will improve _a lot_ consistency (thus, the user experience) is to have a default "look" when the tray icon are clicked: just think about what you see when you click on the battery or device notifier icons, versus the klipper or kmix ones. +1 Exactly what I had in mind. > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > --from Karan Pratap Singh
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
