On Friday 16 March 2012 21:31:11 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Sounds good. > But OTOH, having one workflow for KDE frameworks (i.e. not even all of KDE > SC) would be also a really good thing to have. It will make contributing > easier.
That's pretty much Aaron's point yes. And I clearly see the value in it of course. I've to take into account the current drawbacks identified with the current proposal too though. > Would 2) be an option for KDE frameworks ? Could be[*]. But as you probably gathered from my previous email I'm purposefully not jumping on a definitive choice just yet. More options to investigate and consequences to take into account. Regards. [*] If we were to bless a single one, it's the one with most chances to make it as the one size fit all one in my books ATM. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
