On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:07:08 Björn Balazs wrote: > Have you been aware of this vision?
this was actually rather well laid out and gone over and over and over in the first probably 2 years of the project. it's probably been the last 2 in which this has been not a topic of conversation and those who have come since then are likely to have not seen it explicitly. it would be nice to see a fully formulated version of it go prominentaly on community.kde.org/Plasma/ > If yes: did it support your work (and how)? > If no: looking back would it have been helpful for your work if you had > known it (and how)? > > Is it too general / just right / too specific? what is above is too general to be useful on its own imho. it's the foundational "problem statement" on which we placed the target goals: * fluid, organic interfaces (smooth and pleasing animations; no "magical" appearing/disappearing; things connected conceptually should appear connected visuall; etc..) * activities * folderview as opposed to "desktop is icons" * plasmoids for displaying all sorts of information, and making everything a plasmoid as an extension result and yes, having others answer these quesetions from their POV will be important :) -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
