On Monday, June 04, 2012 11:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote: > That might come as a surprise, but > > Plasma == Active > > Making a difference between those (and the KDE workspace) only makes sense > in a very limited scope. There's only a technical difference, but as we're > explicitely excluding technicalities and focus on vision, just assume > they're the same. > > Workspace == Plasma > Exactly the point I did before. This is something Plasma team (as in you, notmart, ivan, aseigo) think, doesn't mean everybody else does.
> > In the same way we had various people attending the Active sprint that > > weren't part of the plasma/active team (Dario, Aleix, Laszlo, Me) in this > > sprint we will have people from different projects (like telepathy, > > frameworks, solid) that want to work on the workspace and move it forward. > > Same thing here: > - by attending a sprint about Plasma/Active, you are by definition part > of > it: you contribute, otherwise you wouldn't be there > - Might make it easier: You can easily be taking part in more than one > project. > > Aaron struck a note here that explained to me why I hadn't registered > earlier to the sprint -- simply because I didn't feel part of it. By > changing the name, you get that kind of result, and I don't think it's > actually a desired one. You can take this same argument and put it the other way around. If we call this Tokamak (implicitly Plasma sprint) people such as myself won't attend because I didn't consider myself Plasma (until recently anyway). That need fixing on the sprint as I said :) _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel