On Sunday 17 June 2012 09:04:44 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Given the result of the tree game, it is very clear to me that > > implementing > > this feature is not worth the effort. > > Can you elaborate on the tree game? And what were the conclusions > regarding activities in general, and activities+VDs. It's difficult for me to explain. I would leave that to others :-)
In short: we identified activities as one of the core features of our workspaces and VDs are close to fall off the tree. > > This is not really useful for those of us who weren't at the sprint: > http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Workspace_Sprint/Games/ProductTreeSummary > > > As I know that this would be very > > complex and error prone I would veto any attempt to implement it :-) > > I agree that it would be a rather problematic thing that would have *a > lot* of problems, but if somebody spent 6 months on that and provide a > bug-free patch that works even in unimaginable corner cases (the ideal > world scenario) - would you still veto it? :) (just want to see how > hard is the veto, I'm not willing to spend 6 months on that project) I doubt anyone would be able to produce a patch over a time span of 6 month without the help of the KWin team and without a long review period. I would not consider my time well spend by helping such a project. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
