On Friday, January 11, 2013 10:28:22 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Friday 11 January 2013 10:12:13 Martin Sandsmark wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:49:06AM +0100, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > no, removing features is not a regression. It is the decision to remove > > > the > > > feature. The use case for screen savers does no longer exist or when did > > > you last have a screen which needs to be saved? For background reading I > > > recommend [1]. > > > > I still have CRT screens, and plasma displays (yes, ironic or something) > > are highly susceptible to burn-ins as well. LCD displays usually only
"an animated screen saver" is not the only answer. "blank the screen" works just as well, probably even better from a power consumption point of view. blanking the screen is still supported :) > But the discussion again shows that just removing it completely and tell > people to use XSS if they want screen savers would have been the right > choice. agreed. -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel