On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2013, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Thursday 10 January 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > hello. > > > > > > we're nearly at the point of releasing 4.10. with this development > cycle > > > very fresh in mind, it is a reasonble time to reflect on how it went. > > > this thread can be a place for us to do so, if we so wish. and i hope > we > > > do so that we can improve our processes in the future. > > > > > > so how do you think 4.10 went? > > > > mixed feelings: we did a lot, but definitely as already noted the process > > wasn't managed so well and the qa was not at the top (putting also myself > > in the blame list for that, is something that each of us shares a bit) > > thinking more about it... > maybe what we actually need is someone with a wide enough knowledge of the > codebase, that continuously uses master and tests, poking people when > regressions happen? (especially in areas far from what one usually works > in, > since for own area "proximity blindness" can happen) this kindof happens > already, but there isn't anythng "formal "about it > > it would be something not fun to do at all, but perhaps is kinda needed? > a figure that help the release manager? > I think this is too big for one person. It might be better to allocate different people to different parts of Plasma & Kwin. Preferably based on their configuration. We could even make up a page of who uses what kind of configuration (generally), and accordingly see what isn't being covered. > -- > Marco Martin > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
