On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 18:36:27 Marco Martin wrote: > > On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > Even porting a few of the plasmoids wouldn't be the worst of ideas. (I > > > expect the icon one to be interesting ...) Not everything needs to be > > > ported right now, however, especially not components that get frequent > > > activity. > > > > > > And what I really don't want to see is the whole repository turned > upside > > > down right now. Let's keep sebas' branch focused on a minimal set of > > > ported components to test the new shell with. > > > > ok, so now that branch does build and the plasma subdirectory can build > by > > itself having now a complete cmake > > why another branch (plasma2/imageWallpaper)? > > how does it relate to plasma/sebas/desktop-qml-plasma2? > > I started the wallpaper porting there, but that branch had the filesystem reworked, so now i moved all the work in plasma/sebas/desktop-qml-plasma2, and i'm going to delete plasma2/imageWallpaper) > > the directory structure is as untouched as possible > > that's obviously not quite accurate. you re-arranged the plasma directory > structure when it could just as easily have been limited to CMakeLists.txt > changes. that the branch is named "plasma2/imageWallpaper" really doesn't > help, as it does not imply at all that such changes are contained in it > yeah, ignore that branch :) > how we want to end up shipping PW2-based images (either ourselves or our > downstreams) is going to influence these re-arrangements. and so i go back > to > asking: what is making re-arranging the source tree so important right > now? plasma/sebas/desktop-qml-plasma2 has not be re-arranged, so we'll continue there for now Cheers, Marco Martin
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel