On Saturday, June 22, 2013 16:38:56 Ivan ÄukiÄ wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the previous discussions on k-c-d where it was concluded that the > workspace-related code (as opposed to the libs) can use more modern c++ > features as long as those are not introduced after gcc 4.5, I'd like to ask > whether there are objections to add the -std=c++0x flag to the plasma-shell > (plasma2) build?
yes, realy good idea. would love to see all the dptrs move to your spiffy d_ptr smart pointer as well. -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
