On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org> wrote: > On Friday 28 June 2013 11:02:25 Ivan Čukić wrote: >> On Friday 28 June 2013 08:13:32 Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > Git commit 597397b41f5450f24ddc784e0faa13133fed6bd5 by Kevin Ottens. >> > Committed on 28/06/2013 at 08:07. >> > Pushed by ervin into branch 'master'. >> > >> > Revert "Enabling C++11 flags for clang and gcc" >> >> This request [1] got a green light by Aaron [2] and Martin [3]. > > Just to clarify: It's not a "no-no" to using C++11, it's to make sure we're > able to build without them. > >> We could set it only for the shell, and not for the whole repository. > > Is there a point of using libplasma2 out of the shell? Just wondering, could > impact the decision. > > Assuming the answer to the question above is yes, then it could be a > compromise indeed. *But* in that case the build of the shell would have to be > automatically disabled when building without C++11 available.
What's the issue here? Isn't the point of a dependency (on C++11) to make it required? /me definitely thinks we should be moving forward on this front, especially since the main compilers are feature complete now (clang has excellent support for it). -- Shaun Reich, KDE Software Developer (kde.org) _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel