On Wednesday, 2013-07-17, Mark wrote: > True, and that argument alone lets me lean very much towards the > KCalendar stuff. I think i'm just going to follow you on this and go > for KCalendar and friends. It can't be that hard to port it to > QCalendar and friends once that is released. I could also make an > abstraction to make it to toggle between KCalendar and QCalendar > although the later one would be a stub implementation at this moment. > That does make it very easy to switch to a different API in the > future.
I don't think that abstraction is worth the effort. Currently it needs the KDE implementation, once ported to Qt5 its classes should be sufficient and KDE's one will either be deprecated or entirely removed. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
