> On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support.  I'm told 
> > it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not 
> > without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no 
> > desire to do.  I don't think much is required, Solaris uses the Olsen tz 
> > files, just with different patches and possibly a different zonetab layout, 
> > but I don't want to code blind.  So we have two options, one is not worry 
> > about Solaris support for now, and if anyone (Ade?) complains then ask them 
> > to contribute upstream (with my help).  The alternative is to keep the 
> > Solaris code in ktimezoned, including calls to return the current system 
> > time zone and the list of available time zones, and on other platforms just 
> > wrap the Qt calls.  Opinions?
> 
> John Layt wrote:
>     s/patches/paths

I'd like to reiterate the (imho) bigger issue here - there's no effort at all 
to have KF5 and/or PW2 running on Solaris (unlike the Windows effort), so I 
wouldn't push it (only) to the smallest component in the workspace, it makes no 
sense at this time.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42961
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Runtime, KDE Frameworks, Plasma, and John Layt.
> 
> 
> Repository: kde-runtime
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Originally I wanted to port KTimeZoned 1:1 to Qt5/KF5, but then I found out 
> that all the stuff KTZD was doing was added in QTimeZone, that includes 
> reading correct system files/env variables to obtain the timezone and 
> returning the proper system zone (KTZD did all this by itself). It also 
> doesn't need to parse the timezone files itself or watch for their changes as 
> QTimeZone objects are not stored.
> 
> So now it's just a thin module watching /etc/timezone (used by Debian-based 
> distros) and /etc/localtime (used by eg. Fedora or Suse, but also by Debian 
> in conjunction with /etc/timezone) for changes and if it detects a change, it 
> checks if the new timezone is really different and if it is, it sends out a 
> DBus signal "timeZoneChange". I changed it from "configChanged" as I think 
> "timeZoneChanged" makes way more sense.
> 
> I didn't touch the Windows part as I have no way to test, would be nice if 
> someone could help with that.
> 
> EDIT: I removed the other two DBus signals which were not used and I'm unsure 
> KTZD is the correct place for that now anyway. The only usage in 
> KSystemTimeZone can be replaced by own KDirWatch instance.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt a5ec93d 
>   ktimezoned/CMakeLists.txt bafc85e 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned.h ff21807 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned.cpp f380c09 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned_win.h 26e21cc 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned_win.cpp cadfe3a 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezonedbase.h ca00aca 
>   ktimezoned/org.kde.KTimeZoned.xml daaa0b7 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested by changing the timezone in different ways, change was detected and 
> signalled out.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Klapetek
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to