On Monday 23 December 2013 19:45:36 Alex Merry wrote: > On 23/12/13 18:46, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > - plasma-framework: this framework uses multiple licenses, but majority is > > LGPL (this is the case for many other frameworks). Should we use a LGPL > > 2.1 > > COPYING.LIB file? > > A quick attack with git grep shows the majority of code to be LGPL 2 > (+), with the odd LGPL 2.1 (+) file, in the libraries, along with some > GPL2 code (in the examples etc). As such, I committed an LGPL 2.1 > COPYING.LIB file (since that should work for all the LGPL files) and a > GPL2 COPYING file. Is my assumption correct that the examples are from the former kde-examples repository. If yes the number of authors should be rather small. Could we try to relicense them?
Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel