On Monday 27 January 2014 21:45:48 Daniel Nicoletti wrote: > 2014-01-27 Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org>: > > El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va escriure: > >> I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might > >> be > >> better. Then the fourth packaging of 2014.06.2 will be 2014.06.2-4. > > > > Just after reading the email I also thought that 2014.06.2 looks "more > > consistent" than 2014.06-2, on the other hand 2014.06.2 may "easily" be > > confused with a date while 2014.06-2 not so much, so I'm not really sure > > what I like better :D > > I just want to see this thread to end :P > > so maybe (because indeed distros use -X as their packaging versions):
that distros use -X as their packaging versions doesn't matter. We can use: 2014.06-1 and distros can turn it into: 2014.06-1-2-distro-5 what matters is that the version number increases. And that's still the case. What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it also works with beta releases of Plasma Next. If we kind of stick to what we use today it could be. 2014.06-90 for the beta release of Plasma Next with the last stable release having been in June 2014. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel