Hi Jos, On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday 05 May 2014 19:25:51 Martin Graesslin wrote: >> On Monday 05 May 2014 17:56:04 Ivan ?uki? wrote: >> > Jens: >> > > the best option is to simply go with "Plasma by KDE" >> > >> > and >> > >> > > "So what version am I running?" is "Plasma 2", "Plasma 5", >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > I don't mind the version 5.x (though, I didn't mind any of the proposals) >> > >> > Wondering what is Martin's stance on this since the year.month was his >> > child. >> >> oh well, as I'm addressed I'm going to answer. >> >> As it's well known I dislike the 5 for two reasons: >> >> 1. It will end in "Plasma" == "KDE". sebas's point to that is that he >> doesn't care, I understand that, but on the other hand I think it's a lost >> opportunity. >> 2. I'm afraid of people discarding the version because of fear of repeating >> 4.0. > > Yeah. We once did the rebranding thing because there was confusion in our > user base about what 'KDE' meant, which was hurting projects like Amarok and > Krita (you mean you can run Krita outside of KDE? But you need KDE to run > Amarok, right? I don't want all of KDE on my system just to run Kate...).
I am pretty sure Amarok was never the reason for the rebransing, at least not willingly :) Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel