David Edmundson wrote: > If we did that if someone had a fatal crash they wouldn't be able to > contribute to testing for 3 months, which would be a shame.
Good point. Though, those do not need to be bugfix-only releases then. But ok. Aleix Pol wrote: > I thought we agreed that this message doesn't work and we want people to > trust our release as much as possible. > One thing that is very important is to warn users that newer Qt versions > might fix their workflows. Well, it might be my pessimism, but I don't want us to repeat the history with this one. Is Plasma 5 really ready for a day-to-day replacement of 4.x for an average user? Are the distributions up to the task this time? " trust our release" is what we did before, and it backfired. Hugely. Cheerio, Ivan KDE, ivan.cukic at kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/ gpg key id: 850B6F76, keyserver.pgp.com _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
