On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Sebastian Kügler <se...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 22:00:54 Eike Hein wrote: > > Hiding "passive" status notifier items robs the user of an > > entire tier of organization when deciding how near/far they > > want to place a running app. > > This may also encourage more abuse: i.e. not setting the status to hidden, > ever. Remember that we're often dealing with apps who want to forego being > shown in the taskbar (presumably to save space). Effectively, this means > that > apps will set their status to always be active, leading to more clutter in > the > panel. > On the other hand, it's how Unity (and maybe others?) work for years. Let's find out if it was a real problem for them and about how many apps are they aware of abusing this? Cheers -- Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
