https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343962
--- Comment #10 from hipersayan_x <hipersaya...@gmail.com> --- > It brings additional maintenance cost, it brings additional testing costs, > it brings higher chance of things getting broken, leading to more bug > reports etc etc. Ok, then stop making programs just because you are afraid of computer crashing in anytime. Seriously, this is just a flag to disable an unwanted feature, there is no way it can crash nothing. > It's not always "I need this feature, why not give it to me"; the > maintainer/developer has a certain vision about the things he's creating and > sometimes he just has to say no. I'm not the only person asking for this option, this come from long time ago: https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=102145 http://askubuntu.com/questions/293105/how-to-disable-kdes-brightness-osd > And you should respect their opinion. It's > impossible to always please everyone. That's just the way it is. Of course I respect your opinions, what I don't respect is you design decision on this very specific topic. And I believe that the way in which the the OSD is designed is really bad. > In my personal opinion, I would probably also reject that, I wouldn't want 3 > billion options to allow every single combination of options... Ok, then remove systemsetting and all it's components, it will made KDE easy to maintain it isn't? So you are basically arguing against one of the pillar of KDE, and the the reason why most people chooses it. I'm very disappointed. These are my final words, I don't want to make this thread a flame, I just want to have my changes integrated to Powerdevil. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel