-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122522/#review75870
-----------------------------------------------------------


It might be worth investigating the use-case a bit further to try to understand 
if this is the best way to solve this. Is it useful? Yes. But there are 
potentiall negative impacts that should be balanced against the relative 
increase in utility.

We also need to belly up to identifying primary and secondary target personas 
and scenarios for Plasma (maybe a thing for the upcomign sprint). At best, I'd 
suggest that exposing the host name here would target a secondary persona and 
any associated scenarios. 

While I can't argue that the scenario in the bug report isn't legitimate, I'm 
not sure it warrants adding information to the lock-screen that is of 
little-to-no value to primary target personas and scenarios. The cost we're 
trying to mitigate in the bug report is that the user logs in/unlocks to 
identify the computer versus knowing it one interaction step earlier. 

For the lab/shared computers, the scenario requires that more than one computer 
is shared (probably in relative proximity to each other) and some particular 
need that requires knowing the computer identity *before* logging in/unlocking. 
Even in corporate environments that seems like quite a marginal scenario.

So for me, I'm struggling to see how the potentially negative impact of added 
information noise for what I think are the primary target personas and 
scenarios balances what is, I think, a marginal increase in utility for a 
marginal scenario for a secondary target persona.

Hope this helps!

- Andrew Lake


On Feb. 11, 2015, 1:59 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122522/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 11, 2015, 1:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma and Andrew Lake.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 294778
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294778
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-workspace
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> FEATURE: 294778
> FIXED-IN: 5.3.0
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lookandfeel/contents/components/InfoPane.qml 
> 18739ad96724f520ce8467ba5d4c9595e8a9e9ed 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122522/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> Screenshot of LockScreen with new info
>   
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/02/11/771f0a24-aaa1-4bc4-afe8-53c44fe68d71__snapshot_TJ8703.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Gräßlin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to